Antibiotic

 

There are currently considerable challenges with the treatment of infections caused by strains of clinically relevant bacteria that show multi-drug resistance. New antibacterial are urgently needed, but only one new class of antibacterial has been introduced in the last 30 years. Two new antibiotics introduced in 2002 are now withdrawn because the bacteria have rapidly developed resistance.

Tabloid news papers hype-up publication about new advances, antibiotics, antiseptics that kill bacteria in laboratory but the reality is to find a cure is at present very bleak. We have to first understand how bacteria develop antibiotic resistance, understand bacterial cell wall structure and genetic make-up. New drugs must undergo vigorous test to identify toxic effects before a safe antibiotic can be developed.

Antibiotics market generates worldwide sales of over $26 billion, despite the availability of low-priced generic products for many infections. In recent years, eight antibiotics have attained annual sales of more than $1 billion each. The growing medical problem of drug-resistant bacteria presents a new and expanding market opportunity. Bacterial resistance is causing many of the current antibiotics to lose efficacy, while the pipeline of replacement products that target antibiotic resistance is remarkably thin.

How & Why This Is Happening?

We simply don't trust our own immune systems to function properly. Some doctors have made us all hypochondriacs we panic at the first sign of trouble. For instance, we get the flu and rush to consult a doctor, search for information in the internet. We demand a prescription for some broad-spectrum antibiotic feeling like we might not actually live to see another day. The antibiotics won't help us combat the flu since viruses, not bacteria, cause the flu. Still, antibiotics are dangerous since they select more virulent and more drug-resistant strains of bacteria that are present in our digestive tracts.

Using a broad-spectrum therapy when a more specific drug would be better, starting and stopping medications, giving leftover medications to a friend who appears to have the same ailment you had." According to the CDC, one-third of the 150 million outpatient prescriptions for antibiotics written each year in the United States are unnecessary.

We feed antibiotics to livestock in order to promote growth and to compensate for overcrowded and unsanitary conditions. In fact, nearly 70 percent of all antibiotics used in the U.S. are given to animals that are disease-free. Overuse of antibiotics in livestock production as "a major contributor to the creation of drug-resistant bacteria and thus a direct assault on human health." Clearly, this use of antibiotics is detrimental to our health, and yet it's a practice that still persists.

We must thanks antibiotic for the helping us bring in massive changes in understanding and advances in the quality of life possible in the western world. Bacterial infections - in wounds, gut, lungs & brain killed most people in the pre-antibiotic era in the west. Secondary Bacterial infection (Staphylococcus aureus) was the reason millions died during "The Flu Epidemic of 1918".  Change in weather helped to avert he problem as virus stopped spreading as the crowds dispersed and was not due to miracle drug. Influenza epidemic

The present generation of doctors and patients are not familiar with common bacterial infections that produce osteomylitis, epiglottis, tetanus, anthrax, syphilis, scarlet fever, pneumonia and rheumatic fever. These conditions were not common in the last 20 years because the antibiotics reduced the duration of infections and prevented secondary illness.

It looks as if we are heading towards "Pre-Antibiotic era". This is because the bacteriae have now developed resistance to the very antibiotic invented by chance in 1940s. The doctors & patients have abused them for conditions they should not have. These antibiotics have been prescribed to animals, plants and poultry making them useless to kill bacteria that infect us all. Unless we develop another treatment soon, we see no future to mankind and certainly not for medical profession.

People who develop, and control pharmaceutical industry, equipments, and medical device manufacturers need to have woken up and start thinking about this happening. They abandoned R&D and had assumed their investment on drugs that offer symptomatic relief (arthritis, epilepsy, hypertension etc) is going to give them the handsome reward which they are hoping for. There are more people dying with infections in this world than people suffering from pain, yet they ignored plea from doctors and statesmen asking their help. This antibiotic resistant bacterial invasion is likely to bring in an abrupt halt to all advances in healthcare, "The very technology we invented has turned around to haunt us"

Computers revolutionised medical research but let our brain stagnate resulting in rapid progress since 1980. One hundred years of advances in medicine was compressed, packed in a box in the last decade and ready to be buried in a time capsule.

Now I wonder how other doctors like me, who have published papers and warned the healthcare professionals against abusing antibiotics, performing irrelevant investigations and un-necessary procedure are now thinking?

I feel sad to some extent but at the same time feel sorry for those who are aspiring to be the doctors of tomorrow, "We have been instrumental in bringing an end to our own profession". I personally thank the pharmaceutical giants & medical equipment manufactures for their contribution.

The world will be a better place for few who could weather the storm and survive this swamp of bugs that are gathering momentum for a major assault in this planet.

History

In 1928, Alexander Fleming noticed that a patch of the mould Penicillium notatum had grown on a plate containing the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and that around the mould there was a zone where no Staphylococcus could grow. He named the active substance penicillin but was unable to stably isolate it.

Several years later, in 1939, Ernst Chain and Howard Florey developed a way to isolate penicillin and used it to treat bacterial infections during the Second World War. The new drug came into clinical circulation in 1944 and made a huge impact on public health. Their discovery and development revolutionized modern medicine and paved the way for the development of many more natural antibiotics.

Antibiotics paved the way for doctors to develop new technologies (IVF, plastic surgery, hip replacement, minimally invasive surgery, stents, total parentral nutrition's, transplant surgery and cardiac surgery). These technologies have made some doctors rich and famous but now the very technology is threatening our existence in this universe.

Identifying a fungus like Penicillium notatum and extracting the enzyme to produce penicillin commercially took more than 20 years. Now we have this bacteria, armed with some eight toxins, mastered genetic manipulation and knows very well how to change and adopt to survive.

Investing in Antibiotic research and development was not profitable to satisfy the investors in pharmaceutical companies so was abandoned in 1970s.

Now its too late and they are unlikely to find a new treatment and so are now busy investing in rapid testing kits to help identify the bacteria. This makes sense to insurance companies, hospitals who are striving to keep infection rate low and investors. As doctors we must not forget the basic rule & ethics of performing a diagnostic test is to identify and offer treatment. We must not perform a test knowing there is no cure, this is likely to produce more distress than comfort.

Some drug companies are raising our hope by fast tracking publication in the media and some are also cashing in giving us the wrong information. We don't think any of these will help as we know the vaccination developed was found to have short term immunity.

Using Germicidal Wipes can spread bacteria because they were found not to kill and antiseptic soap was found to increase colonization of antibiotic resistant bacteria on our skin.

Most of us think we will have immunity to these bacteria,. Yes we would have but the genetic make up of this is different, they know how to kill the army of white cells in our body. White cells are necessary to defend us from invading predators.

These drugs were also used in veterinary medicine to treat infections. Small dose of antibiotics were widely used to promoting growth of farm animals and in various food industries. Now the pigs are said to be colonized with the same bacteria which infect us. Over use of antibiotics, inadequate dose and patients not completing the course as advised has given the bacteria to gradually develop resistance.

In general, healthy people are not at risk of MRSA infection in hospital. Factors that increase the risk include length of stay in hospital, use of multiple antibiotics, severity of illness, recent surgery, and use of invasive procedures and presence of medical devices (e.g. catheters, cannulae, and tubes).

"The time may come when penicillin can be bought by anyone in the shops. Then there is a danger that the ignorant man may easily under dose himself and by exposing his microbes to non-lethal quantities of the drug make them resistant. " Dr Alexander Fleming, Dec. 11, 1945

Antibiotic Use:

 

Inappropriate, under dosing, patients not taking prescription as advised and overuse, contributes to resistance. If your skin infection isn't improving after a 2-3 days of taking an antibiotic, contact your doctor.
 

Taking antibiotics for common cold, viral infections leads to staphylococcus developing resistant strains in your body. When you're prescribed an antibiotic, make sure you take all of the doses, even if the infection is getting better. Don't stop until your doctor tells you to stop.

 

Don't share antibiotics with others or save unfinished antibiotics for another time.

 

Persistent Staphylococcus aureus is said to be device-associated infection. Patients with continuous high-grade bacteremia who do not have acute bacterial infections, an abscess, or a device-related infection should be considered to have antimicrobial "tolerance" as a possible cause. Antimicrobial "tolerance" is defined as a wide discrepancy between the minimal inhibitory concentration and the minimal bactericidal concentration of an isolate. Tolerance was first described in Staphylococcus aureus and has since been described with streptococci and enterococci.

 

Despite apparent in vitro susceptibility, infections caused by "tolerant" strains are not cured by appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The lack of bactericidal activity of the antibiotic becomes apparent when minimal bactericidal concentrations are determined for "tolerant" strains, and there is a great discrepancy between the minimal inhibitory concentration being used. Antibiotic tolerance to S. aureus has been described with a variety of antibiotics.

Up-Date About Antibiotics

Tomasz and colleagues found a new antibiotic called Ceftobiprole annihilated colonies of MRSA. Like penicillin – one of the first and still one of the most widely used antibiotic agents – Ceftobiprole binds enzymes crucial to making bacterial cell walls, ultimately killing the bacteria. Although Tomasz is excited about this new potential weapon against MRSA, he cautions that bacteria are true survivors and capable of finding a way around any drug, even Ceftobiprole. So the war against Staphylococcus aureus continues.

The general claim put forth goes something like this: bacteria, insects, rodents and other undesirables (as far as we're concerned) are encountering manmade toxins such as antibiotics, and toxic chemicals such as DDT and warfarin, designed to kill off the offending nasties. In response, some of these creatures are adapting, changing and achieving capabilities that enable them to resist the toxins threatening to destroy them. These drug-resistant strains, we are told, are evolving. According to some doomsayers we are now faced with plagues of untreatable "super germs" that will wreak havoc among Western civilization, striking down innumerable people as doctors watch helplessly, unable to prescribe an effective cure.

According to standard (monophyletic) evolutionary theory, all life on earth is descended from an original population of very simple single-celled organisms, perhaps something like algae. One of the inescapable conclusions of evolution, therefore, is that organisms have attained additional capabilities, additional functional structures, and greater complexity over time. This is unavoidable. No matter how one fudges, somewhere between algae and man all of the structures, systems, and abilities we see in the human body must have developed through the interplay of non-sentient natural processes.

Malaria meds have knock-on effect in bacteria

Searching for a cure

Read about Influenza 1918 and the American experience to understand the gravity of this situation. People infected with Influenza virus were immune-compromised, developed secondary infection with Staphylococcus aureus which killed them.

Estimated potential worldwide death toll ranges from 7.4 million to 180 million to 360 million, extrapolating 1918’s deaths to today’s population. Given global air travel, the virus could spread swiftly, possibly reaching all continents in three months, the WHO asserts. The federal government fears that 9 million Americans may become sick; most experts now assess the potential mortality rate at 1.5 percent to 2 percent. An index of how overtaxed health-care resources might become is the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention’s estimate of roughly 200 million outpatient visits and 2 million to 5 million hospital admissions.

Keeping with the belief that doing anything to fend off influenza was better than sitting idly by, waiting to become a statistic.

New Antibiotic

Aminomethylcyclines (AMCs)

AMCs were evolved from tetracycline antibiotics as potential agents to combat multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria, including MRSA, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), multidrug resistant Escherichia coli and other difficult-to-treat pathogens. Introduced more than 50 years ago, tetracyclines remain among the most commonly used antiinfective agents to combat bacterial infections. However, the emergence of resistance has curtailed their effectiveness in certain infections. Paratek has utilized its expertise to create AMC compounds, such as PTK 0796, that retain the appealing safety and spectrum of activity of the tetracyclines while overcoming tetracycline and multi-drug resistance.

Linezolid (Zyvox)

New Antibiotic was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000 to treat a variety of infections, including some caused by bacteria resistant to the drug methicillin. Methicillin – resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a major cause of infections both in hospitals and communities. For years the antibiotic vancomycin had been a last line of defence against infections caused by MRSA and other antibiotic-resistant “super bugs,” but now vancomycin-resistant infections have been reported.

Linezolid is among the first new treatments for MRSA infections since vancomycin was introduced in the 1950s. Unlike other newer antibiotics for MRSA and VRE, linezolid can be given orally, as well as intravenously, making it suitable for outpatient use.

Linezolid produced a clinical cure for 81 percent of patients, while the comparator combination was effective for 71 percent of patients. Statistically, the overall results for the two groups were about equal. However, linezolid outperformed the aminopenicillin treatments in the largest subgroup: patients with an infected ulcer, as opposed to cellulites, osteomyelitis, or other less common types of diabetic foot infections.

First report of Linezolid Resistant SA Emerging (LRSA):

Ceftobiprole

Ceftobiprole has been granted "fast-track" status from the FDA and is licensed from, and is being co-developed with, Basilea Pharmaceutica Ltd, Switzerland, through an exclusive worldwide collaboration.

New drug, called Ceftobiprole, was tested against some of the deadliest strains of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria, which are responsible for the great majority of staphylococcal infections worldwide, both in hospitals and in the community.

By targeting the gene that confers such resistance, a new drug may be able to finally fight them. Rockefeller University scientists tested the new drug, called Ceftobiprole, against some of the deadliest strains of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria. Ceftobiprole worked against bacterial clones that had already developed resistance to other drugs. Previous research had already shown that — in general — Ceftobiprole was highly effective against most clinical isolates of S. aureus.

In the past newer antibiotic arrives on the scene, and sooner or later resistant bacteria emerge.

Ceftobiprole vs. Vancomycin

In patients with complicated skin infections, outcomes were similar for ceftobiprole (a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against MRSA) and vancomycin

Dalbavancin

Pfizer announced today that it would withdraw marketing application being considered at FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for Dalbavancin an antibiotic it was developing for complicated skin infections caused by bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Chemicals in Marijuana May Fight MRSA

Study Shows Cannabinoids May Be Useful Against Drug-Resistant Staph Infection

Researchers in Italy and the U.K. tested five major marijuana chemicals called cannabinoids on different strains of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). All five showed germ-killing activity against the MRSA strains in lab tests. Some synthetic cannabinoids also showed germ-killing capability. The scientists note the cannabinoids kill bacteria in a different way than traditional antibiotics, meaning they might be able to bypass bacterial resistance. Ref: G. Journal of Natural Products, 2008; vol 71: pp 1427-1430

Manuka Honey

Researchers have examined MRSA that has come in contact with Manuka Honey and have determined that MRSA cannot survive in the healing environment created by Manuka Honey. MRSA is a bacterium that grows and divides into two similar cells every half hour. It divides by forming a wall across the middle of the cell, which then splits in half to create two new cells. Studies have shown that Manuka Honey interferes with the cell cycle of MRSA by affecting the separation of new cells, so that cells unable to complete division are disabled at that point in the cell cycle.

All types of honey contain hydrogen peroxide which is a known antiseptic and disinfectant. Manuka honey has an additional antibacterial component making it much more effective for therapeutic use. This additional component, known as UMF, is unaffected by enzymes that dilutes the effectiveness of regular honey. It remains active when used as a wound dressing and diffuses deeper into skin tissues.

Manuka Honey is also considered to be antimicrobial and, therefore, capable of treating local bacterial and fungal skin infections. We are a long way from using this as a cure or using the knowledge to develop new antibiotics.

Bacteriophage

 

Use of Bacteriophage for local and intestinal infections is still controversial but there is no treatment available for treating bloodstream infection. Some microbiologist think MRSA will be more virulent when they are infected with a bacteriophage. Bacteriphage can carry plasmid from one bacteria to another.

MRSA and other super bugs have made many people anxious, and they are looking for ways to avoid these germs.  But everyone needs to know that antibacterial products are NOT the best line of attack against  MRSA and other germs.  While they can help in a pinch, overuse is linked to antibiotic-resistance

The Ganges is a place of death and life. Hindus from all over will bring their dead. Whether a body or just ashes, the waters of the Ganga are needed to reach Pitriloka (the World of the Ancestors). Just as in the myth with King Sargas' 60,000 sons who attained heaven by Ganga pouring down her water upon their ashes, so the same waters of Ganga are needed for the dead in the Hindu belief today. Without this, the dead will exist only in a limbo of suffering, and would be troublesome spirits to those still living on earth. The waters of the Ganges are called amrita, the "nectar of immortality".

ATEL Ventures Invests $1.8 Million of Financing in GangaGen, Inc.
Innovative approach revolutionize the treatment of antibiotic resistant bacterial infections such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using bacteriophage....
 







 

Registration Form

 

 


©2007 Medifix & Samsarx ®